https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343087 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order demanding service tax on construction services, amounting to &8377;53,70,906/- for 2004-2008, along with penalties. The appellants argued for classification as works contracts from 01/06/2007 based on a Supreme Court decision. They disputed taxability of independent house construction for MPHB and challenged the quantification of taxable value for contracts. The Tribunal found flaws in the Original Authority's reasoning, remanding the case for re-examination of classifications and tax liabilities, citing inadequacies in addressing limitation and penalties, granting the appellants a fresh opportunity to present their case. en-us Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 May 2017 07:33:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343087 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order demanding service tax on construction services, amounting to &8377;53,70,906/- for 2004-2008, along with penalties. The appellants argued for classification as works contracts from 01/06/2007 based on a Supreme Court decision. They disputed taxability of independent house construction for MPHB and challenged the quantification of taxable value for contracts. The Tribunal found flaws in the Original Authority's reasoning, remanding the case for re-examination of classifications and tax liabilities, citing inadequacies in addressing limitation and penalties, granting the appellants a fresh opportunity to present their case. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343087