<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 807 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty liability and interest payment by the appellant, confirming it as correct and valid. However, the penalties imposed under Section 11AC and Central Excise Rules were set aside as unwarranted. The Tribunal found no intention to evade duty payment and emphasized the proper documentation and confirmation of goods receipt. The appeal was disposed of on 12/04/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 807 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty liability and interest payment by the appellant, confirming it as correct and valid. However, the penalties imposed under Section 11AC and Central Excise Rules were set aside as unwarranted. The Tribunal found no intention to evade duty payment and emphasized the proper documentation and confirmation of goods receipt. The appeal was disposed of on 12/04/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>