https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343066 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the application for rectification of mistake filed by the appellant, which sought correction of errors in the final order dated 21.6.2016. The Tribunal found that the demand made was not time-barred, and the duty on spare parts, labour, and trading was sustainable. The appellant's arguments regarding cum duty price consideration and reworking duty liability were also rejected. The Tribunal held that the application lacked merit and was dismissed on 11.4.2017. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 May 2017 07:32:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343066 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the application for rectification of mistake filed by the appellant, which sought correction of errors in the final order dated 21.6.2016. The Tribunal found that the demand made was not time-barred, and the duty on spare parts, labour, and trading was sustainable. The appellant's arguments regarding cum duty price consideration and reworking duty liability were also rejected. The Tribunal held that the application lacked merit and was dismissed on 11.4.2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343066