<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 797 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343059</link>
    <description>Glass woven rovings imported by the assessee were held to fall within the express exclusion in the anti-dumping duty notification, as amended, and were therefore not chargeable to anti-dumping duty. The Tribunal relied on the notification text, the Chartered Engineer&#039;s opinion that such rovings were mainly used for applications other than thermoplastic uses, and the clarification from the Director General (Anti-Dumping) confirming the specific exclusion. The Revenue&#039;s narrower reading, limiting the exclusion only to rovings meant for thermoplastic applications, was not accepted, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 797 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343059</link>
      <description>Glass woven rovings imported by the assessee were held to fall within the express exclusion in the anti-dumping duty notification, as amended, and were therefore not chargeable to anti-dumping duty. The Tribunal relied on the notification text, the Chartered Engineer&#039;s opinion that such rovings were mainly used for applications other than thermoplastic uses, and the clarification from the Director General (Anti-Dumping) confirming the specific exclusion. The Revenue&#039;s narrower reading, limiting the exclusion only to rovings meant for thermoplastic applications, was not accepted, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>