<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 796 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343058</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the U.P. VAT Act requires an objective reason to believe, based on concrete material, that turnover has escaped assessment, been under-assessed, taxed at a lower rate, or wrongly allowed as deduction or exemption. A later view on the same material amounts only to a change of opinion and cannot justify reassessment or be used as a substitute for review of the original assessment. The extended limitation period does not dispense with this jurisdictional requirement. On that basis, the reassessment proceedings, the Commissioner&#039;s permission, and the consequential notices were held invalid and quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 07:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 796 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343058</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the U.P. VAT Act requires an objective reason to believe, based on concrete material, that turnover has escaped assessment, been under-assessed, taxed at a lower rate, or wrongly allowed as deduction or exemption. A later view on the same material amounts only to a change of opinion and cannot justify reassessment or be used as a substitute for review of the original assessment. The extended limitation period does not dispense with this jurisdictional requirement. On that basis, the reassessment proceedings, the Commissioner&#039;s permission, and the consequential notices were held invalid and quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>