https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343053 The court dismissed the application for condonation of a 335-day delay in filing the appeal due to the unsatisfactory explanation provided by the Department. The court emphasized that condonation of delay should not be a routine benefit and highlighted the need for diligence in government departments. Despite being informed about the electronic filing system and provided with necessary services, the Department's internal procedures were found inadequate to justify the significant delay. As a result, both the application for condonation and the appeal were dismissed for failing to meet legal standards. en-us Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 May 2017 07:31:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343053 The court dismissed the application for condonation of a 335-day delay in filing the appeal due to the unsatisfactory explanation provided by the Department. The court emphasized that condonation of delay should not be a routine benefit and highlighted the need for diligence in government departments. Despite being informed about the electronic filing system and provided with necessary services, the Department's internal procedures were found inadequate to justify the significant delay. As a result, both the application for condonation and the appeal were dismissed for failing to meet legal standards. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343053