<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 788 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343050</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that the claim made by the assessee, though incorrect, did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars with the intention to conceal income. The Court dismissed the appeal by the appellant-revenue, stating that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 07:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 788 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343050</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that the claim made by the assessee, though incorrect, did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars with the intention to conceal income. The Court dismissed the appeal by the appellant-revenue, stating that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>