<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 779 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the deletion of the addition based on the survey statement and partially upholding the disallowance of foreign travel expenses. The levy of interest under section 234D was dismissed as consequential. The Tribunal stressed the significance of corroborative evidence and the correct procedure for retracting statements made during surveys.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 07:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 779 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the deletion of the addition based on the survey statement and partially upholding the disallowance of foreign travel expenses. The levy of interest under section 234D was dismissed as consequential. The Tribunal stressed the significance of corroborative evidence and the correct procedure for retracting statements made during surveys.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>