<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 772 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty under section 271C. The Tribunal found reasonable cause for certain defaults, such as the applicability of different TDS sections and non-liability of TDS on certain payments. It excluded amounts where TDS was paid in the succeeding year due to pending reconciliation. The decision applied mutatis mutandis to all related appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 772 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty under section 271C. The Tribunal found reasonable cause for certain defaults, such as the applicability of different TDS sections and non-liability of TDS on certain payments. It excluded amounts where TDS was paid in the succeeding year due to pending reconciliation. The decision applied mutatis mutandis to all related appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>