<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (12) TMI 25 - COURT OF APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192158</link>
    <description>Voluntary collections made for a professional cricketer at matches were treated as taxable employment income where they arose under his contract of service and the incorporated league rules. The decisive question was whether, from the recipient&#039;s standpoint, the sums accrued by virtue of employment and as remuneration for services, even though spectators paid them voluntarily and described them as gifts or tributes. The Court distinguished personal testimonials and retirement benefits, noting that these collections were recurrent, linked to the professional engagement, and formed part of what the player was contractually entitled to receive. The collections were therefore taxable as profits arising from employment rather than personal gifts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 17:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (12) TMI 25 - COURT OF APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192158</link>
      <description>Voluntary collections made for a professional cricketer at matches were treated as taxable employment income where they arose under his contract of service and the incorporated league rules. The decisive question was whether, from the recipient&#039;s standpoint, the sums accrued by virtue of employment and as remuneration for services, even though spectators paid them voluntarily and described them as gifts or tributes. The Court distinguished personal testimonials and retirement benefits, noting that these collections were recurrent, linked to the professional engagement, and formed part of what the player was contractually entitled to receive. The collections were therefore taxable as profits arising from employment rather than personal gifts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>