https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192157 Writ relief under Article 226 may be refused where a petitioner admits liability and uses extraordinary jurisdiction only to resist recovery. The Court treated the guarantor's liability as undisputed and noted that the amount remained unpaid despite opportunity. Because writ jurisdiction is discretionary, interference can be declined when it would defeat the interests of justice or permit an unfair advantage. On these facts, the attempt was to avoid an admitted monetary obligation through writ proceedings, so relief was rightly denied and the challenge failed. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 May 2017 17:32:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192157 Writ relief under Article 226 may be refused where a petitioner admits liability and uses extraordinary jurisdiction only to resist recovery. The Court treated the guarantor's liability as undisputed and noted that the amount remained unpaid despite opportunity. Because writ jurisdiction is discretionary, interference can be declined when it would defeat the interests of justice or permit an unfair advantage. On these facts, the attempt was to avoid an admitted monetary obligation through writ proceedings, so relief was rightly denied and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192157