https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192151 A claim for eviction on the ground of reconstruction must be bona fide on the whole evidence, including the condition of the building, the landlord's means, and the need to rebuild; a mere assertion of intention is insufficient. The concurrent findings below treated the building as sound and the landlord as lacking means to reconstruct, so bona fides was not established. In revision, a court cannot overturn concurrent factual findings without a reasoned demonstration of error or impropriety. On that basis, the revisional interference was held unwarranted and the tenants' relief was restored. en-us Wed, 17 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 May 2017 13:23:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192151 A claim for eviction on the ground of reconstruction must be bona fide on the whole evidence, including the condition of the building, the landlord's means, and the need to rebuild; a mere assertion of intention is insufficient. The concurrent findings below treated the building as sound and the landlord as lacking means to reconstruct, so bona fides was not established. In revision, a court cannot overturn concurrent factual findings without a reasoned demonstration of error or impropriety. On that basis, the revisional interference was held unwarranted and the tenants' relief was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192151