https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192148 Validating legislation within the acquisition law field may retrospectively sustain prior acquisitions and connected proceedings despite earlier adverse decisions, without expressly reviving an earlier notification, provided the validating provision gives them legal effect. Compensation remains constitutionally compliant where the statutory valuation principle continues to apply and multiple declarations under a single acquisition notification do not create illusory or unrelated compensation. Differential treatment of pending and future acquisitions, or of landowners under a denotification policy, requires an intelligible classification rationally connected with the legislative or policy objective. The contrary view treated reliance on an exhausted notification and valuation by a past date as incompatible with the constitutional compensation requirement. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 May 2017 11:18:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192148 Validating legislation within the acquisition law field may retrospectively sustain prior acquisitions and connected proceedings despite earlier adverse decisions, without expressly reviving an earlier notification, provided the validating provision gives them legal effect. Compensation remains constitutionally compliant where the statutory valuation principle continues to apply and multiple declarations under a single acquisition notification do not create illusory or unrelated compensation. Differential treatment of pending and future acquisitions, or of landowners under a denotification policy, requires an intelligible classification rationally connected with the legislative or policy objective. The contrary view treated reliance on an exhausted notification and valuation by a past date as incompatible with the constitutional compensation requirement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192148