<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (1) TMI 12 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7836</link>
    <description>A payment described as 50% commission under an agency agreement was held deductible as business expenditure because it was incurred on a commercial basis to secure finance and support production and sales. The court construed the agreement by its covenants and surrounding commercial circumstances, and found that the agreed commission formula did not, by itself, convert the arrangement into a true profit-sharing joint venture. Heavy financial participation, control over the plant, and an undertaking to bear losses were insufficient to show that the amount was the assessee&#039;s own share of profits. The amount was therefore deductible under section 10(2)(xv) and not taxable as profit in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (1) TMI 12 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7836</link>
      <description>A payment described as 50% commission under an agency agreement was held deductible as business expenditure because it was incurred on a commercial basis to secure finance and support production and sales. The court construed the agreement by its covenants and surrounding commercial circumstances, and found that the agreed commission formula did not, by itself, convert the arrangement into a true profit-sharing joint venture. Heavy financial participation, control over the plant, and an undertaking to bear losses were insufficient to show that the amount was the assessee&#039;s own share of profits. The amount was therefore deductible under section 10(2)(xv) and not taxable as profit in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>