<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 749 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343011</link>
    <description>Opting for SSI exemption could require reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs and finished goods in stock under the relevant excise rules, but the demand failed because the rules did not provide a machinery for assessment or recovery of that amount. The Tribunal distinguished situations where legislation later cured the defect, noting that no corresponding recovery provision had been introduced here. As a result, the liability, even if recognised, could not be enforced by demand and the assessee&#039;s appeal was correctly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 749 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343011</link>
      <description>Opting for SSI exemption could require reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs and finished goods in stock under the relevant excise rules, but the demand failed because the rules did not provide a machinery for assessment or recovery of that amount. The Tribunal distinguished situations where legislation later cured the defect, noting that no corresponding recovery provision had been introduced here. As a result, the liability, even if recognised, could not be enforced by demand and the assessee&#039;s appeal was correctly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>