<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 747 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343009</link>
    <description>The application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order regarding rejection of drawback claims for goods supplied to SEZ units under the Central Excise Act was dismissed. The Member(Judicial) found no error apparent on the face of the record that required rectification, emphasizing that the appellant&#039;s arguments had already been considered in detail in the previous order. The rejection of the drawback claims was upheld, and the appellant was advised to file an appeal instead of seeking a re-hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 08:09:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 747 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343009</link>
      <description>The application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order regarding rejection of drawback claims for goods supplied to SEZ units under the Central Excise Act was dismissed. The Member(Judicial) found no error apparent on the face of the record that required rectification, emphasizing that the appellant&#039;s arguments had already been considered in detail in the previous order. The rejection of the drawback claims was upheld, and the appellant was advised to file an appeal instead of seeking a re-hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>