https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343001 The appellate tribunal upheld penalties under Sections 112 and 117 in a case involving the seizure and confiscation of goods suspected to be of foreign origin under the Customs Act, 1962. While penalties on Md. Abdus Sattar were maintained due to habitual offenses and lack of redemption option for confiscated goods, Md. Riyajuddin's penalty was reduced to Rs. 25,000 despite questionable actions facilitating illegal imports. The judgment stressed the significance of verifying consignment details diligently and compliance with regulations to deter smuggling activities, underscoring operational limitations in postal address verification. en-us Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343001 The appellate tribunal upheld penalties under Sections 112 and 117 in a case involving the seizure and confiscation of goods suspected to be of foreign origin under the Customs Act, 1962. While penalties on Md. Abdus Sattar were maintained due to habitual offenses and lack of redemption option for confiscated goods, Md. Riyajuddin's penalty was reduced to Rs. 25,000 despite questionable actions facilitating illegal imports. The judgment stressed the significance of verifying consignment details diligently and compliance with regulations to deter smuggling activities, underscoring operational limitations in postal address verification. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343001