<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 730 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the AO to compute income based on the completed project method and overturning the adhoc addition of work in progress based on the percentage completion method. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in accounting methods and rejected the application of certain accounting standards to contracts entered into before their effective dates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 21:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 730 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the AO to compute income based on the completed project method and overturning the adhoc addition of work in progress based on the percentage completion method. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in accounting methods and rejected the application of certain accounting standards to contracts entered into before their effective dates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>