<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 724 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342986</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the reassessment orders as the Assessing Officer failed to comply with mandatory provisions and Tribunal directions, rendering the reassessment invalid. The reassessment proceedings were deemed academic, and additions were deleted for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The ITAT stressed the importance of addressing objections raised by the assessee before making assessments under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, following precedents like M/s. S. Power Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO and PCIT vs. Tupper Ware India Pvt. Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 07:17:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 724 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342986</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the reassessment orders as the Assessing Officer failed to comply with mandatory provisions and Tribunal directions, rendering the reassessment invalid. The reassessment proceedings were deemed academic, and additions were deleted for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The ITAT stressed the importance of addressing objections raised by the assessee before making assessments under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, following precedents like M/s. S. Power Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO and PCIT vs. Tupper Ware India Pvt. Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>