<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Dismisses Tax Demand on Iron Ore Fines Due to Lack of Evidence in Business Auxiliary Service Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34822</link>
    <description>Valuation - Business Auxiliary Service - deemed additional consideration - Revenue has no evidence to support the allegation that the value of iron ore fines likely to emerge during the crushing operation have impacted the crushing charges and, as such, are to be considered as additional consideration for taxable service demand set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 06:51:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 06:51:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Dismisses Tax Demand on Iron Ore Fines Due to Lack of Evidence in Business Auxiliary Service Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34822</link>
      <description>Valuation - Business Auxiliary Service - deemed additional consideration - Revenue has no evidence to support the allegation that the value of iron ore fines likely to emerge during the crushing operation have impacted the crushing charges and, as such, are to be considered as additional consideration for taxable service demand set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 06:51:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>