<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 704 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342966</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the valuation of taxable services rendered, specifically regarding the inclusion of the value of iron ore fines in the consideration for tax purposes. The tribunal held that the iron ore fines retained by the appellant should not be added to the taxable consideration as they did not directly impact the fixed crushing charges agreed upon with customers. Additionally, the tribunal rejected the imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and found no basis for demanding the extended period, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 704 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342966</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the valuation of taxable services rendered, specifically regarding the inclusion of the value of iron ore fines in the consideration for tax purposes. The tribunal held that the iron ore fines retained by the appellant should not be added to the taxable consideration as they did not directly impact the fixed crushing charges agreed upon with customers. Additionally, the tribunal rejected the imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and found no basis for demanding the extended period, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>