<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 697 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342959</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, denying CENVAT credit for service tax paid on LPG used for electricity generation and sold to third parties. The Court confirmed disallowance of CENVAT credit for both units, amounting to Rs. 2,20,23,582/-, as the electricity sold externally did not qualify as an input service under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The Court also held that service tax paid on the transportation of LPG did not qualify for CENVAT credit, emphasizing the requirement for the service to be used in manufacturing the final product within the factory. All appeals were dismissed, and the demand for reversal of CENVAT credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 697 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342959</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, denying CENVAT credit for service tax paid on LPG used for electricity generation and sold to third parties. The Court confirmed disallowance of CENVAT credit for both units, amounting to Rs. 2,20,23,582/-, as the electricity sold externally did not qualify as an input service under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The Court also held that service tax paid on the transportation of LPG did not qualify for CENVAT credit, emphasizing the requirement for the service to be used in manufacturing the final product within the factory. All appeals were dismissed, and the demand for reversal of CENVAT credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>