<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1195 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192119</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the TPO to reexamine certain comparables, reconsider working capital and risk adjustments, and verify the claim for liquidated damages. The ITAT emphasized the need for functional comparability and adherence to judicial precedents in determining the ALP. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions for the TPO and AO to follow.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 05:46:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1195 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192119</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the TPO to reexamine certain comparables, reconsider working capital and risk adjustments, and verify the claim for liquidated damages. The ITAT emphasized the need for functional comparability and adherence to judicial precedents in determining the ALP. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions for the TPO and AO to follow.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>