https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342929 The appellate tribunal upheld duty demand and penalty under Section 11AC against the appellant for avoiding duty payment on goods manufactured through job work, finding no bonafide intention. The tribunal rejected the appellant's argument of time bar for demand, citing suppression of facts detected through investigation. The redemption fine on goods cleared without duty payment was set aside as the goods were not available for confiscation. Despite appellant's denial of suppressing facts, the tribunal upheld penalty under Section 11AC due to clear suppression, maintaining duty demand and penalty. en-us Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 May 2017 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342929 The appellate tribunal upheld duty demand and penalty under Section 11AC against the appellant for avoiding duty payment on goods manufactured through job work, finding no bonafide intention. The tribunal rejected the appellant's argument of time bar for demand, citing suppression of facts detected through investigation. The redemption fine on goods cleared without duty payment was set aside as the goods were not available for confiscation. Despite appellant's denial of suppressing facts, the tribunal upheld penalty under Section 11AC due to clear suppression, maintaining duty demand and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342929