<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 661 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342923</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned order and permitted the petitioner to place additional facts and documents on record, allowing the record to be supplemented for consideration in the Special Leave Petitions. After hearing counsel and examining the material, the Court found no merit in the petitions and dismissed them. The order reflects that the procedural requests were allowed, but the substantive challenge did not justify interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 661 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342923</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned order and permitted the petitioner to place additional facts and documents on record, allowing the record to be supplemented for consideration in the Special Leave Petitions. After hearing counsel and examining the material, the Court found no merit in the petitions and dismissed them. The order reflects that the procedural requests were allowed, but the substantive challenge did not justify interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>