https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342919 The court set aside the notice issued under Section 59(2) of the DVAT Act due to the VATO's failure to follow proper procedures and lack of reasoning. The petitioner's refund application was directed to be processed promptly, with instructions for timely payment and interest. The DVAT Department was mandated to adhere to refund processing timelines, with the petitioner granted the right to seek legal remedies for non-compliance or non-payment. The case concluded with the disposal of the petition, addressing issues related to file inspection, notice issuance, refund application, and compliance by the authorities. en-us Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 May 2017 05:45:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342919 The court set aside the notice issued under Section 59(2) of the DVAT Act due to the VATO's failure to follow proper procedures and lack of reasoning. The petitioner's refund application was directed to be processed promptly, with instructions for timely payment and interest. The DVAT Department was mandated to adhere to refund processing timelines, with the petitioner granted the right to seek legal remedies for non-compliance or non-payment. The case concluded with the disposal of the petition, addressing issues related to file inspection, notice issuance, refund application, and compliance by the authorities. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342919