<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 649 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342911</link>
    <description>Reversal of CENVAT credit attributable to inputs used in exempted clearances was treated as satisfying the condition in Notification No. 30/2004-CE that such credit not be availed. The Tribunal accepted that subsequent reversal amounts to compliance with the non-availment requirement, relying on prior decisions and the deeming approach under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s contrary argument based on a different factual setting and confirmed that the exemption remained available where the attributable credit had been reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 649 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342911</link>
      <description>Reversal of CENVAT credit attributable to inputs used in exempted clearances was treated as satisfying the condition in Notification No. 30/2004-CE that such credit not be availed. The Tribunal accepted that subsequent reversal amounts to compliance with the non-availment requirement, relying on prior decisions and the deeming approach under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s contrary argument based on a different factual setting and confirmed that the exemption remained available where the attributable credit had been reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>