<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342909</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 to 25% of the duty amount due to early payment by the appellant. Additionally, the redemption fine imposed on seized goods was reduced from &amp;amp;8377;20 lakhs to &amp;amp;8377;15 lakhs considering the depreciation of the goods while in custody. The appellant received partial relief in both instances, with the Tribunal adjusting the penalties accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 05:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342909</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 to 25% of the duty amount due to early payment by the appellant. Additionally, the redemption fine imposed on seized goods was reduced from &amp;amp;8377;20 lakhs to &amp;amp;8377;15 lakhs considering the depreciation of the goods while in custody. The appellant received partial relief in both instances, with the Tribunal adjusting the penalties accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>