<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 646 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals by the company and two individuals challenging the recovery of duty and penalties imposed for alleged illicit removal of goods. The Tribunal found the Show Cause Notice to be valid, distinct from previous issues, and upheld the penalties based on evidence of involvement in fraudulent transactions. However, the penalty on one individual was partially allowed, reducing it to Rs. 50,000 due to his reduced role in the offense. The decision was rendered on 07.04.2017, concluding the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 05:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 646 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals by the company and two individuals challenging the recovery of duty and penalties imposed for alleged illicit removal of goods. The Tribunal found the Show Cause Notice to be valid, distinct from previous issues, and upheld the penalties based on evidence of involvement in fraudulent transactions. However, the penalty on one individual was partially allowed, reducing it to Rs. 50,000 due to his reduced role in the offense. The decision was rendered on 07.04.2017, concluding the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>