<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1353 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192112</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 82,35,112/-, supporting the assessee&#039;s treatment of the disputed amount as contingent sales. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s method consistent with AS-9 and the mercantile system of accounting, recognizing revenue based on real income and reflecting uncertainty in collectability due to ongoing litigation. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 20:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1353 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192112</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 82,35,112/-, supporting the assessee&#039;s treatment of the disputed amount as contingent sales. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s method consistent with AS-9 and the mercantile system of accounting, recognizing revenue based on real income and reflecting uncertainty in collectability due to ongoing litigation. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>