<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1206 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192114</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law. The court held that the assessee&#039;s conduct and rejected books of account lacked credibility, indicating an attempt to defraud the Revenue. The court emphasized that explanations for specific transactions in isolation, without addressing all discrepancies, were insufficient. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question arose from the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 20:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1206 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192114</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law. The court held that the assessee&#039;s conduct and rejected books of account lacked credibility, indicating an attempt to defraud the Revenue. The court emphasized that explanations for specific transactions in isolation, without addressing all discrepancies, were insufficient. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question arose from the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>