<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Claims Overturned: No Penalty for Higher MRP u/s 11AC, No Intent to Evade Duty Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34804</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 11AC - case of Revenue is that appellant have sold the goods on higher MRP as compared to the MRP considered at the time of the clearance of the goods - The change of MRP is not with malafide intention to evade/avoid payment of duty whereas the same is under a practice prevailing in the case of the consumer goods therefore there is no suppression of facts or malafide intention of the respondent - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 11:43:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 11:43:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Claims Overturned: No Penalty for Higher MRP u/s 11AC, No Intent to Evade Duty Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34804</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 11AC - case of Revenue is that appellant have sold the goods on higher MRP as compared to the MRP considered at the time of the clearance of the goods - The change of MRP is not with malafide intention to evade/avoid payment of duty whereas the same is under a practice prevailing in the case of the consumer goods therefore there is no suppression of facts or malafide intention of the respondent - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 11:43:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>