<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1352 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192094</link>
    <description>The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal and focused on whether the ITAT adequately addressed the Assessee&#039;s claim regarding the absence of an international transaction for AMP expenses. The Court emphasized the need to decide on this issue first before proceeding with further inquiries, setting aside the ITAT&#039;s order and restoring the appeal for reevaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 08:51:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1352 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192094</link>
      <description>The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal and focused on whether the ITAT adequately addressed the Assessee&#039;s claim regarding the absence of an international transaction for AMP expenses. The Court emphasized the need to decide on this issue first before proceeding with further inquiries, setting aside the ITAT&#039;s order and restoring the appeal for reevaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>