https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192096 The Supreme Court declined to entertain central excise appeals because the tax effect was nominal, and it therefore refused to decide the dispute on merits. The dismissal rested solely on the low tax effect, leaving the substantive issues in the appeals unexamined. The order illustrates that where the revenue impact is negligible, the Court may dismiss the matter without entering into the underlying central excise controversy. en-us Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 May 2017 08:51:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192096 The Supreme Court declined to entertain central excise appeals because the tax effect was nominal, and it therefore refused to decide the dispute on merits. The dismissal rested solely on the low tax effect, leaving the substantive issues in the appeals unexamined. The order illustrates that where the revenue impact is negligible, the Court may dismiss the matter without entering into the underlying central excise controversy. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192096