<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 624 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342886</link>
    <description>An appellate authority cannot reject a refund claim on a ground not raised in the show-cause notice, particularly where the original authority had already found the claim timely. Where Notification No. 9/2009-ST had been superseded, the assessee was required to proceed under Notification No. 17/2011-ST, and rejection for filing under the earlier notification was unsustainable. The refund claim was therefore maintainable under the applicable notification, the rejection was set aside, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 624 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342886</link>
      <description>An appellate authority cannot reject a refund claim on a ground not raised in the show-cause notice, particularly where the original authority had already found the claim timely. Where Notification No. 9/2009-ST had been superseded, the assessee was required to proceed under Notification No. 17/2011-ST, and rejection for filing under the earlier notification was unsustainable. The refund claim was therefore maintainable under the applicable notification, the rejection was set aside, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>