<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 620 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as the appellant did not take cenvat credit on the input services for manufacturing exempted goods, rendering the rule inapplicable. Despite citing court decisions, the appellant&#039;s failure to reflect any credit in their returns led to the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of fulfilling the conditions for refund claims under the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 07:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 620 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as the appellant did not take cenvat credit on the input services for manufacturing exempted goods, rendering the rule inapplicable. Despite citing court decisions, the appellant&#039;s failure to reflect any credit in their returns led to the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of fulfilling the conditions for refund claims under the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>