https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342879 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating Commissioner in a case concerning the wrongful availment of SSI exemption due to the use of a brand name. The dispute centered on whether the brand name "RADOJI" used by the respondent was deceptively similar to the registered brand name "RADO." The lack of specific allegations in the show cause notice regarding the similarity of brand names led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the evidence supported the respondent's claim of using "RADOJI" and not infringing on the registered brand "RADO," affirming the Commissioner's decision. en-us Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jul 2017 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342879 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating Commissioner in a case concerning the wrongful availment of SSI exemption due to the use of a brand name. The dispute centered on whether the brand name "RADOJI" used by the respondent was deceptively similar to the registered brand name "RADO." The lack of specific allegations in the show cause notice regarding the similarity of brand names led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the evidence supported the respondent's claim of using "RADOJI" and not infringing on the registered brand "RADO," affirming the Commissioner's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342879