<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 603 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the 8% or 10% payment under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is not a duty or tax and therefore cannot be deducted from the price of exempted goods. The Tribunal clarified that the reversal amount is an option extended and exercised by the assessee, not a compulsory exaction of money for public purposes. The reference was answered accordingly, directing the matter to be disposed of by the regular Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 603 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the 8% or 10% payment under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is not a duty or tax and therefore cannot be deducted from the price of exempted goods. The Tribunal clarified that the reversal amount is an option extended and exercised by the assessee, not a compulsory exaction of money for public purposes. The reference was answered accordingly, directing the matter to be disposed of by the regular Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>