<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 602 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority to offer the appellant the option of reduced penalty in compliance with the Board Circular. The judgment emphasized the significance of disclosing facts to the department and the procedural obligations for penalty imposition under Section 11AC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 602 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority to offer the appellant the option of reduced penalty in compliance with the Board Circular. The judgment emphasized the significance of disclosing facts to the department and the procedural obligations for penalty imposition under Section 11AC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>