<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 596 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Department&#039;s Rectification of Mistake application, dismissing the appeals regarding SSI benefit eligibility under Notification No.08/2003. The Tribunal found that the villages Thummaluru and Maheswaram, included in the HUDA jurisdiction, were urban areas based on complete documents provided by the Department. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument that the villages remained rural, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of producing sufficient evidence. The appeals were dismissed, and the Rectification of Mistake application was granted due to reliance on incomplete documents in the initial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 08:43:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 596 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Department&#039;s Rectification of Mistake application, dismissing the appeals regarding SSI benefit eligibility under Notification No.08/2003. The Tribunal found that the villages Thummaluru and Maheswaram, included in the HUDA jurisdiction, were urban areas based on complete documents provided by the Department. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument that the villages remained rural, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of producing sufficient evidence. The appeals were dismissed, and the Rectification of Mistake application was granted due to reliance on incomplete documents in the initial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>