<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 595 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342857</link>
    <description>Entitlement to All Industry Rate duty drawback on exports under free shipping bills turned on clause 4 of the Board Circular dated 23.09.2010 and the drawback rules. The Tribunal noted that the adjudicating authority had not recorded a finding on the circular&#039;s applicability, and that the limitation basis used in the impugned order was not prescribed by the circular. As the exporter&#039;s request had not been examined on merits and natural justice required a proper consideration, the matter could not be finally decided on the existing record. The impugned order was set aside and the claim was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 08:42:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 595 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342857</link>
      <description>Entitlement to All Industry Rate duty drawback on exports under free shipping bills turned on clause 4 of the Board Circular dated 23.09.2010 and the drawback rules. The Tribunal noted that the adjudicating authority had not recorded a finding on the circular&#039;s applicability, and that the limitation basis used in the impugned order was not prescribed by the circular. As the exporter&#039;s request had not been examined on merits and natural justice required a proper consideration, the matter could not be finally decided on the existing record. The impugned order was set aside and the claim was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>