https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192087 An arbitral appointment made after the employer missed the contractual time limit was upheld because the contractor was then entitled to proceed under the agreed mechanism, and the employer's participation without timely objection amounted to waiver. The award was also sustained despite the municipal council not being joined, because the contract and surrounding arrangements showed that the employer undertook project responsibilities and was personally liable, making Section 230 of the Contract Act inapplicable. The Section 34 challenge to interest, compensation, price adjustment, and other monetary reliefs failed because the award was reasoned, evidence-based, and disclosed no statutory ground or public policy breach. en-us Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 May 2017 17:19:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192087 An arbitral appointment made after the employer missed the contractual time limit was upheld because the contractor was then entitled to proceed under the agreed mechanism, and the employer's participation without timely objection amounted to waiver. The award was also sustained despite the municipal council not being joined, because the contract and surrounding arrangements showed that the employer undertook project responsibilities and was personally liable, making Section 230 of the Contract Act inapplicable. The Section 34 challenge to interest, compensation, price adjustment, and other monetary reliefs failed because the award was reasoned, evidence-based, and disclosed no statutory ground or public policy breach. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192087