<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (2) TMI 54 - ASSAM AND NAGALAND High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7799</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was invalid as it failed to meet the conditions of Section 147(a) and was time-barred under Section 147(b). The court used its jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash the notice, directing the respondents to cancel it. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (2) TMI 54 - ASSAM AND NAGALAND High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7799</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was invalid as it failed to meet the conditions of Section 147(a) and was time-barred under Section 147(b). The court used its jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash the notice, directing the respondents to cancel it. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>