<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1508 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192081</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and dismissed the special leave petition after holding that Virlon Textile Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai directly governed the issues raised. It treated the earlier decision as controlling, applied stare decisis, and declined any independent re-examination of the petitioner&#039;s arguments because the precedent was found to be directly applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1508 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192081</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and dismissed the special leave petition after holding that Virlon Textile Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai directly governed the issues raised. It treated the earlier decision as controlling, applied stare decisis, and declined any independent re-examination of the petitioner&#039;s arguments because the precedent was found to be directly applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>