<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1292 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192077</link>
    <description>Actual transit breakages were treated as revenue expenditure in the accounting year in which they occurred, and the High Court&#039;s view allowing the deduction in that year was left undisturbed. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the special leave petitions, thereby accepting that such breakage losses were deductible in the relevant year on the facts presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 12:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1292 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192077</link>
      <description>Actual transit breakages were treated as revenue expenditure in the accounting year in which they occurred, and the High Court&#039;s view allowing the deduction in that year was left undisturbed. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the special leave petitions, thereby accepting that such breakage losses were deductible in the relevant year on the facts presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>