<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 566 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for a service tax refund on all services except rent-a-cab services. The appellant&#039;s submission of the required Bank Reconciliation Certificate (BRC) rectified the procedural deficiency, leading to a partial allowance of the appeals. The previous rejection based on the lack of correlation between input and output services was overturned, and specific refund amounts were specified for each appeal, in line with previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 07:56:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 566 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for a service tax refund on all services except rent-a-cab services. The appellant&#039;s submission of the required Bank Reconciliation Certificate (BRC) rectified the procedural deficiency, leading to a partial allowance of the appeals. The previous rejection based on the lack of correlation between input and output services was overturned, and specific refund amounts were specified for each appeal, in line with previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>