<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 563 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342825</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on office furniture used in premises from which taxable output services are provided was found admissible. The analysis treated the claim as covered by a Board circular recognising credit on furniture and stationery used in office areas within the factory, and it also relied on prior Tribunal authority supporting the same position. On that basis, denial of credit on the furniture items was held unsustainable and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 07:55:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 563 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342825</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on office furniture used in premises from which taxable output services are provided was found admissible. The analysis treated the claim as covered by a Board circular recognising credit on furniture and stationery used in office areas within the factory, and it also relied on prior Tribunal authority supporting the same position. On that basis, denial of credit on the furniture items was held unsustainable and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>