https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342807 The appeal against the Final Order dated 17th October, 2016 by CESTAT was allowed. The Court found that the revocation of the Customs Broker Licence was invalid due to non-compliance with the Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2013 time limits. The Court held that the extension of investigation time by CESTAT was without jurisdiction, leading to the setting aside of the revocation order. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were imposed. en-us Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342807 The appeal against the Final Order dated 17th October, 2016 by CESTAT was allowed. The Court found that the revocation of the Customs Broker Licence was invalid due to non-compliance with the Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2013 time limits. The Court held that the extension of investigation time by CESTAT was without jurisdiction, leading to the setting aside of the revocation order. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were imposed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342807