<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342787</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the loan obtained by the assessee firm from a Private Limited Company, where the partners of the assessee firm are shareholders, should not be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Since the assessee firm is not a shareholder in the company, the loan should not be taxed in its hands. The appeal was allowed, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer treating the loan as deemed dividend was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 07:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342787</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the loan obtained by the assessee firm from a Private Limited Company, where the partners of the assessee firm are shareholders, should not be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Since the assessee firm is not a shareholder in the company, the loan should not be taxed in its hands. The appeal was allowed, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer treating the loan as deemed dividend was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>