<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2644 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192071</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2006-07. The decision emphasized the need to establish the actual consideration received by the assessee for penalty imposition, despite the application of section 50C for valuation purposes. The lack of evidence supporting the inaccurate particulars of income allegation led to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 19:57:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=468407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2644 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192071</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2006-07. The decision emphasized the need to establish the actual consideration received by the assessee for penalty imposition, despite the application of section 50C for valuation purposes. The lack of evidence supporting the inaccurate particulars of income allegation led to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>